Realidades 3 Workbook Answers Capitulo 10 Cuales son tus derechos y deberes?
Realidades 3 Workbook Answers Chapter 10 Cuales son tus derechos y deberes?
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 133
1. The drawing shows a cop handcuffing a thief.
The missing words are:
policía (the policeman) apresó (caught)
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
El policía apresó al ladrón./ The policeman caught the thief.
2. The drawing shows a judge and two layers having a chat.
The missing words are:
juez (judge) abogados (lawyers)
2 Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
El juez y los abogados hablan./ The judge and the lawyers speak.
3. The drawing shows two neighbors arguing.
The missing words are:
vecinas (neighbors) pelean (fight)
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Las vecinas se pelean./ The neighbors fight.
4. The drawing shows an anti-war protest.
The missing words are:
Huelga (strike) Contra (against)
Let´s a look at the full sentence:
Hay una huelga en contra de la guerra./ There is a strike against the war.
5. The drawing shows Luisito disobeying his parents.
The missing words are
obedece (obeys) padres (parents)
Luisito no obedece a sus padres./ Luisito does not obey his parents.
6. The drawing shows a woman about to enter in the community center. Next to her there´s a sign that reads “Do not enter”.
The missing words :
puede
Let´s a look at the full sentence:
No se puede entrar en el centro de la comunidad./ You cannot enter the community center.
7. The drawing shows a group of persons doing the Naturalization Oath of Allegiance.
The missing word is:
ciudadanos (citizens)
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Estas personas están contentas porque se hicieron ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos./ These people are happy because they became citizens of the United States.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 134
1. A. 1.Eran las nueve de la mañana cuando los membro del grupo se reunieron. 2.Cuando era niño, mis amigos y yo siempre disrutábamos de las vacaciones. 3.El juez nos dio que nostros no obedecimos la ley esa tarde, 4.Era mi mejor amiga y por eso siempre confié en ella. 5.Hubo un problema grande, pero tú lo resolviste. – A 1. It was nine in the morning when the members of the group gathered.
2. When I was a kid, my friends and I always enjoyed vacations. 3.The judge told us that we did not obey the law that afternoon.
3. She was my best friend and that’s why I always trusted her.
4. There was a big problem, but you solved it.
B. 1.Yo creía que querías venir. 2.Es que yo no sabía que había una manifestación. 3.Yo lo supe después. 4.No, Ana quería ir 5.(..) pero no pudo. 6.Ana no quería dejarla sola. 7.Yo tampoco lo conocía. 8.Lo conocí allí, en la manifestación. – B. 1. I thought you wanted to come.
2.It´s that I did not know that there was a demonstration.
3. I found out later. 4.No, Ana wanted to go
4. (..) but she couldn’t. 6.Ana didn’t want to leave her alone.
5. I didn’t know him either.
6. I met him there, at the demonstration.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 135
1. The scrambled word is
uijstiianc
Unscrambled it would be:
injusticia/ injustice
Now, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Papá, no es justo, es una justicia./ Dad it´s not fair, it is an injustice.
2. The scrambled word is
nattar
Unscrambled it would be:
tratan
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Uds. me tratan como a un niño pequeño./ You treat me like a little child.
3. The scrambled word is
ibtaelrd
Unscrambled it would be:
libertad/ freedom
Now, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Tengo 17 años y debo tener la libertad de decidir a qué hora vuelvo a casa./ I am 17 years old and I must have the freedom to decide what time I come home.
4. The scrambled word is
pesreto
Unscrambled it would be:
respeto/ respect
Now, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Te exigimos que nos trates con respeto./ We demand that you treat us with respect.
5. The scrambled word is
araaldmtto
Unscrambled it would be:
maltratado/ mistreated
Now, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
A ti nunca te hemos maltratado./ We have never mistreated you.
6. The scrambled word is
liobagn
Unscrambled it would be:
obligan
Now, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Pero, mamá, tú y papá me olbigan a hacer ciertas cosas y me prohíben que haga otras./ But, Mom, you and Dad force me to do certain things and forbid me to do others.
7. The scrambled word is
bedeser
Unscrambled it would be:
deberes/ chores
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
No me gustan estos deberes./ I don´t like these chores.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 136
1. La escuela no permite que los estudiantes se vistan como quieran. – The school does not allow students to dress however they want.
Which means: La escuela tiene un código de vestimenta. – Which means: The school has a dress code.
2. Todos son iguales ante la ley. – All are equal before the law.
Hay igualdad ante la ley. – There is equality before the law.
3. Nadie puede maltratar a los niños. – No one can mistreat children.
Los niños no pueden estar sujetos a maltratos. – Children cannot be subjected to abuse.
4. No me hagan ir con Uds. – Don’t make me go with you.
No me obliguen a ir con Uds. – Don’t make me go with you.
5. Quieren que yo sea feliz. – They want me to be happy.
Quieren mi felicidad. – They want my happiness.
6. Los estudiantes no tienen que pagar sus estudios. – Students do not have to pay for their studies.
Which means: Los estudiantes reciben una enseñanza gratuita. – Students receive free tuition.
7. En los Estados Unidos las personas piensan y se expresan libremente. – In the United States, people think and express themselves freely.
Which means: En los Estados Unidos hay la libertad de pensamiento y expresión. – In the United States there is freedom of thought and expression.
Missing answers: 8. El estudiante respeta la autoridad de sus maestros. 9.Gozan de libertad de expresión. 10. El estado tiene que aplicar las leyes. – Missing answers:
8. The student respects the authority of his teachers. 9. They enjoy freedom of expression. 10. The state has to enforce the laws.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 137
1. Given that “las responsabilidades” is the subject, “discutir” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
Discutidas
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (f., plural)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fueron + discutidas
Finally, let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Las responsabilidades del gobierno fueron discutidas en los periódicos./ The responsibilities of the government were discussed in the newspapers.
2. Given that “programas de salud” is the subject; “promover” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
Promovidos
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (m., plural)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fueron +promovidos
Next, we add the predicate to form the full sentence:
Varios programas de salud fueron promovidos por las enfermeras de la ciudad./ Various health programs were promoted by city nurses.
3. Given that “un discurso” is the subject, “leer” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
leído
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (m., singular)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fue+ leído
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Un discurso fue leído por el presidente del país./ A speech was read by the president of the country.
4. Given that “varios temas” is the subject, “tratar” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
tratados
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (m., plural)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fueron+ tratados
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Varios temas fueron tratados en el discurso./ Various topics were covered in the speech.
5. Given that “una nueva tienda de deportes” is the subject, “abrir” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
abierta
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (f., singular)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fue+ abierta
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Una nueva tienda de deportes fue abierta en el centro./ A new sports store was opened downtown.
6. Given that “clientes” is the subject, “entrevistar” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
entrevistados
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (m., plural)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fueron+ entrevistados
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Muchos clientes fueron entrevistados por los reporteros./ Many clients were interviewed by reporters.
7. Given that “las opiniones” is the subject, “escuchar” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
escuchadas
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (f., plural)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
fueron+ escuchadas
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Las opiniones de los clientes fueron escuchadas por el público.
8. Given that “el problema de la contaminación del río ” is the subject, “resolver” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
resuelto
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (m., singular)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fue+ resuelto
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
El problema de la contaminación del río fue resuelto por un grupo de estudiantes./ The river pollution problem was solved by a group of students.
9. Given that “una campaña de limpieza” is the subject, “organizar” is going to be conjugated in the past participle:
organizada
Note that the past participle is an adjective and agrees in number and gender with the subject. (f., singular)
To form the passive voice in the preterite, we must add the verb “Ser” before the past participle:
Fue+ organizada
Finally, we add the predicate to form the full sentence.
Una campaña de limpieza fue organizada por ellos./ A cleaning campaign was organized by them.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 138
1. “hacer” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “piden” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “hacer” using the present subjunctive:
Los estudiantes (ellos) + hagan / Students (they) + do
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿Los profesores piden que los estudiantes hagan tarea durante las vacaciones?/ Do teachers ask students to do homework during vacation?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “hacer” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes pedían que los estudiantes hicieran tarea durante las vacaciones. Ya no./ They used to ask students to do homework during the holidays. Not anymore.
2. “aplicarse” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “permite” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “aplicarse” using the present subjunctive:
Las reglas (ellas) se apliquen/ The rules (they) be applied
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿La escuela permite que las reglas no se apliquen con igualdad?/ Does the school allow the rules to not be applied equally?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “aplicarse” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes permitían que no se aplicaran con igualdad. Ya no. / Before they allowed the rules not to be applied equally. Not anymore.
3. “abrir” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “deja” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “abrir” using the present subjunctive:
Los profesores (ellos) + abran / The teachers (them) + open
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿La escuela deja que los profesores abran los armarios de los estudiantes? / Does the school let teachers open student lockers?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “abrir” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes permitía que los profesores abrieran los armarios de los estudiantes. Ya no./ It used to allow teachers to open student lockers. Not anymore.
4. “haber” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “insiste” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “haber” using the present subjunctive:
haya
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿El director insiste en que haya un código de vestimenta? / Does the principal insist on a dress code?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “haber” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes insistía en que hubiera un código de vestimenta. Ya no. / Before, he insisted that there be a dress code. Not anymore
5. “participar” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “es” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “participar” using the present subjunctive:
Los estudiantes (ellos) + participen / Students (they) + to participate
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿Es posible que los estudiantes participen en todas las decisiones del colegio?/ Is it possible for students to participate in all decisions of the school?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “participar” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes era posible que los estudiantes participaran en todas las decisiones del colegio. Ya no./ Before it was possible for students to participate in all decisions of the school. Not anymore.
6. “quedarse” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “Es” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “quedarse” using the present subjunctive:
Los estudiantes (ellos) + se queden / Students (they) + to stay
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿Es necesario que los estudiantes se queden hasta las cinco de la tarde?/ Do students need to stay until five in the afternoon?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “quedarse” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes era necesario que los estudiantes se quedaran hasta las cinco de la tarde. Ya no./ Before it was necessary for students to stay until five in the afternoon. Not anymore.
7. “sacar” is the verb that makes the most sense.
Given that the verb in the main clause “se prohíbe” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “sacar” using the present subjunctive:
Los estudiantes (ellos) + saquen / Students (they) + to borrow
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿Se prohibe que los estudiantes saquen libros de la biblioteca?/ Are students prohibited from borrowing books from the library?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “sacar” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes se prohibía que los estudiantes sacaran libros de la biblioteca. Ya no./ Before, students were prohibited from borrowing books from the library. Not anymore.
8. “Levantarse” is the verb that makes the most sense
Given that the verb in the main clause “exigen” is in the present tense; we´re conjugating “levantarse” using the present subjunctive:
Los estudiantes (ellos) + se levanten / Students (they) + get up
Let´s take a look at the question:
¿Exigen que los estudiantes se levanten cuando entra el profesor?/ Do they demand that the students get up when the teacher enters?
As you will see, the verb in the main clause is now in the imperfect; while “levantarse” is in the imperfect subjunctive:
Antes exigían que los estudiantes se levantaran cuando entraba el profesor. Ya no. / They used to demand that the students get up when the professor entered. Not anymore.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 139
1. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the imperfect (les había pedido); we are going to use the imperfect subjunctive.
Pero el profesor les había pedido que estudiaran. / But the professor had asked them to study.
2. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the present (Me soprende); we are going to use the present perfect subjunctive.
Me sorprende que no haya votado./ I’m surprised she did not vote.
3. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the present (Me alegro); we are going to use the present perfect subjunctive.
Me alegro que se hayan divertido./ I´m glad they had fun.
4. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the preterite (le dijo); we are going to use the imperfect subjunctive.
Yo sé que su madre le dijo que se la pusiera./ I know his mother told him to put it on.
5. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the preterite (les exigió); we are going to use the imperfect subjunctive.
El director del colegio les exigió que se trataron con respeto./ The school principal demanded that they treat each other with respect.
6. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the present (creo); we are going to use the present perfect subjunctive.
Pero yo no creo que lo haya escrito./ But I don’t think he wrote it.
7. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the present (nos gusta); we are going to use the present perfect subjunctive.
No nos gusta que hayan sido establecidas./ We don’t like that they have been established.
8. Given that the verb in the main clause is in the present (me parece); we are going to use the present perfect subjunctive.
Me parece injusto que las hayan prohibido./ It seems unfair to me that they have been banned.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 140
1. The missing words are:
acusado/ defendant juicio/ trial
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
El acusado, o la persona que se cree cometió un crimen, tiene derecho a tener un juicio rápido y público./ The accused, or the person believed to have committed a crime, has the right to a public trial.
2. The missing word is:
valor/ value
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
La libertad de palabra es algo importante en la democracia, y es un valor que mucha gente respeta./ Freedom of speech is something important in democracy, and it is a value that people hold dear.
3. The missing words are:
Proponen / They propose Mundiales/ global, world
Let´s take a look at the full sentence:
Unos chicos tienen ideas y proponen soluciones a los conflictos del planeta, o problemas mundiales./ Some boys have ideas and propose solutions to the conflicts of the planet, or world problems.
4. testigos : witnesses culpables: guilty
Las personas que vieron al accidente son los testigos y ellos pueden ayudar a decidir si el acusado es culpable o inocente./ The people who saw the accident are the witnesses and they can help decide whether the defendant is guilty or innocent.
5. detener/ detain
La policía no puede arrestar ni detener a una persona son acusarla de un crimen específico./ The police cannot arrest or detain a person without charging them with a specific crime.
6. opinamos aspiraciones
Nosotros creemos y opinamos que todos tienen derecho a hacer las cosas que desean hacer y lograr sus aspiraciones./ We believe that everyone has the right to do the things they want to do and achieve their aspirations.
7. The missing words are:
intercambiar propuestas
Los jóvenes hablan entre ellos para intercambiar sus ideas y dar sus propuestas para resolver los problemas del medio ambiente./ Young people talk among themselves to exchange their ideas and give their proposals to solve environmental problems.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 141
1. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ exigido in the pluperfect subjunctive
Las mujeres (ellas) hubieran + exigido / The women (they) have demanded.
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me pareció bien que las mujeres hubieran exigido la igualdad de derechos./ It seemed good to me that women had demanded equal rights.
2. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ pedido in the pluperfect subjunctive
Los trabajadores (ellos) + hubieran pedido/ The workers (they) + had asked for
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me gustó que los trabajadores hubieran pedido mejor acceso a los hospitales./ I liked that the workers had asked for better access to the hospitals.
3. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ decidido in the pluperfect subjunctive
(ellos ) hubieran + decidido / (they) had decided
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me pareció importante que hubieran decidido tratar mejor a los extranjeros./ It seemed important to me that they had decided to treat foreigners better.
4. We are going to conjugate the verb haber + prometido in the pluperfect subjunctive
El gobierno (él) hubiera + prometido / The government (he) would have + promised
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
No pude creer que el gobierno hubiera prometido proteger la libertad de prensa./ I couldn’t believe that the government had promised to protect press freedom.
5. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ garantizado in the pluperfect subjunctive
Ellos + hubieran garantizado / They + had been guaranteed.
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me alegré de que hubieran garantizado los derechos del acusado./ I was glad that the rights of the accused had been guaranteed.
6. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ propuesto in the pluperfect subjunctive
Ellos hubieran + propuesto / They +had proposed
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Dudaba que ellos hubieran propuesto soluciones pacíficas a los conflictos con otros países./ He doubted that they had proposed peaceful solutions to conflicts with other countries.
7. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ empezado in the pluperfect subjunctive
El gobierno (él) + hubiera empezado / The government (it) + had started
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Fue bueno que el gobierno hubiera empezado a luchar contra el desempleo./ It was good that the government had started fighting unemployment.
8. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ mejorado in the pluperfect subjunctive
El país (él) hubieran + mejorado / The country (it) had improved
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
¡Cuánto me alegré de que el país hubiera mejorado tanto!/ How glad I was that the country had improved so much!
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 142
1. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ exigido in the pluperfect subjunctive
Las mujeres (ellas) hubieran + exigido / The women (they) have demanded.
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me pareció bien que las mujeres hubieran exigido la igualdad de derechos./ It seemed good to me that women had demanded equal rights.
2. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ pedido in the pluperfect subjunctive
Los trabajadores (ellos) + hubieran pedido/ The workers (they) + had asked for
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me gustó que los trabajadores hubieran pedido mejor acceso a los hospitales./ I liked that the workers had asked for better access to the hospitals.
3. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ decidido in the pluperfect subjunctive
(ellos ) hubieran + decidido / (they) had decided
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me pareció importante que hubieran decidido tratar mejor a los extranjeros./ It seemed important to me that they had decided to treat foreigners better.
4. We are going to conjugate the verb haber + prometido in the pluperfect subjunctive
El gobierno (él) hubiera + prometido / The government (he) would have + promised
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
No pude creer que el gobierno hubiera prometido proteger la libertad de prensa./ I couldn’t believe that the government had promised to protect press freedom.
5. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ garantizado in the pluperfect subjunctive
Ellos + hubieran garantizado / They + had been guaranteed.
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Me alegré de que hubieran garantizado los derechos del acusado./ I was glad that the rights of the accused had been guaranteed.
6. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ propuesto in the pluperfect subjunctive
Ellos hubieran + propuesto / They +had proposed
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Dudaba que ellos hubieran propuesto soluciones pacíficas a los conflictos con otros países./ He doubted that they had proposed peaceful solutions to conflicts with other countries.
7. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ empezado in the pluperfect subjunctive
El gobierno (él) + hubiera empezado / The government (it) + had started
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
Fue bueno que el gobierno hubiera empezado a luchar contra el desempleo./ It was good that the government had started fighting unemployment.
8. We are going to conjugate the verb haber+ mejorado in the pluperfect subjunctive
El país (él) hubieran + mejorado / The country (it) had improved
Note that the “haber” is in the past subjunctive + the past participle of the other verb.
Finally, we add the main clause and the predicate:
¡Cuánto me alegré de que el país hubiera mejorado tanto!/ How glad I was that the country had improved so much!
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 143
1. The question is:
Marta estaba enferma, pero salió. ¿A Luisa le parece bien eso?/ Marta was sick, but she went out. Is that okay with Luisa?
Given that Luisa´s personal pronoun is ella / she; and the verb is haber + salido, we are going to use the conditional perfect:
Ella + habría salido / She would have come out.
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to be an answer that contradicts the previous statement:
No, ella no habría salido./ No, she would not have come out.
2. The question is:
El agua del lago estaba muy fría, sin embargo nadé. ¿A ti te parece bien eso?/ The lake´s water was very cold, however, I swam. Is that okay with you?
Given that the personal pronoun is tú/ you; and the verbs are haber + nadado, we are going to use the conditional perfect. The question is directed towards the speaker, so we are going to use the personal pronoun “yo/ I”
Yo + habría nadado/ I would have swam
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to be an answer that contradicts the previous statement.:
No, yo no habría nadado. / No, I would not have swum.
3. The question is:
A Pablo no le cae bien Susana, pero él la invitó. ¿A Francisco le parece bien eso?/ Pablo doesn’t like Susana, but he invited her. Is that okay with Francisco?
Given that the personal pronoun is él/ he ; and the verbs are haber + invitado, we are going to use the conditional perfect.
Él + habría invitado/ He + would have invited
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement.:
No, él no la habría invitado./ No, he would not have invited her.
4. The question is:
A mí no me gustó la decisión, pero la acepté. ¿A ti te parece bien esto? / I did not like the decision, but I accepted it. Is this okay with you?
Given that the personal pronoun is tú/ you; and the verbs are haber + aceptado, we are going to use the conditional perfect. The question is directed towards the speaker, so we are going to use the personal pronoun “yo/ I”
Yo + habría aceptado/ I would have accepted
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it’s going to contradict the previous statement.:
No, yo no la habría aceptado./ No, I wouldn’t have accepted it.
5. The question is:
Sarita tenía prisa y no respetó las reglas. ¿A Uds. les parece bien eso? / Sarita was in a hurry and didn’t respect the rules. Is that okay with you?
Given that the personal pronoun is Uds./ you; and the verbs are haber +respetado, we are going to use the conditional perfect. The question is directed towards the speakers, so we are going to use the personal pronoun “Nosotros/ Us”
Nosotros + habríamos respetado./ We + would have respected
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement.
No, nosotros habríamos respetado las reglas. / No, we would have respected the rules.
6. The question is:
Marcos no preguntó y no se enteró del problema. ¿A los otros les parece bien eso?/ Marcos did not ask and did not find out about the problem. Is that okay with the others?
Given that “Los otros” personal pronoun is ellos / they; and the verbs are haber + enterado, and haber + preguntado we are going to use the conditional perfect:
Ellos + se habrían enterado/ They + would have known about. Ellos + habrían preguntado/ They + would have asked
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement:
No, ellos habrían preguntado y se habrían enterado del problema./ No, they would have asked and found out about the problem
7. The question is:
No encontraron la evidencia porque no buscaron en la casa, ¿A Uds. les parece bien eso? / They didn’t find the evidence because they didn’t search the house, is that okay with you?
Given that the personal pronoun is Uds./ you; and the verbs are “encontrado”; and “buscaron” we are going to use the conditional perfect. The question is directed towards the speaker, so we are going to use the personal pronoun “Nosotros/ Us”
Nosotros +habríamos encontrado / We + would have found. Nosotros + habríamos buscado / We + would have searched
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement:
No, nosotros habríamos buscado la evidencia porque habríamos buscado en la casa. / No, we would have searched the evidence because we would have searched the house.
8. The question is:
Ellos no comprendían el problema y no lo resolvieron. ¿A ti te parece bien eso? / They did not understand the problem and did not solve it. Is that okay with you?
Given that the personal pronoun is ellos / they; and the verbs are “comprender”, and “resolver” we are going to use the conditional perfect:
Ellos + habrían comprendido/ They + would have understood Ellos + habrían resuelto/ They + would have solved
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement:
No, ellos habrían comprendido el problema y lo habrían resuelto./ No, they would have understood the problem and solved it.
9. This is the question:
Alfredo no puso atención y no propuso una solución. ¿A nuestros amigos les parece bien eso?/ Alfredo did not pay attention and did not propose a solution. Is that okay with our friends?
Given that “Nuestros amigos” personal pronoun is ellos / they, and the verbs are “poner atención”, and “proponer” we are going to use the conditional perfect:
Ellos + habrían puesto atención / They would have paid attention. Ellos + habrían propuesto/ They + would have proposed.
We´re using the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb.
Let´s take a look at the full answer. Keep in mind that it´s going to contradict the previous statement:
No, ellos habrían puesto atención y habrían propuesto una solución. / No, they would have paid attention and would have proposed a solution.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 144
1. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the past perfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that the personal pronoun is tú (you), we´re going to conjugate the verbs:
Conducir ( to drive)
Hubieras conducido/ You had driven
Detener (to detain)
Habría detenido ( would have stopped you)
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si no hubieras conducido tan rápidamente, la policía no te habría detenido./ If you hadn’t driven so fast, the police wouldn’t have stopped you.
2. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that Pedro´s personal pronoun is él ( He), we´re going to conjugate the first verb:
-Dejar ( to leave)
Él hubiera dejado / He would have left
The next verb agrees with the subject “El carro”
-Desaparecerse ( to disappear)
Se habría desaparecido / Would have disappeared
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si Pedro no hubiera dejado abierta la puerta de su coche, su coche no habría desaparecido. / If Pedro hadn’t left his car door open, his car would not have disappeared.
3. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that the verb “Haber” isn´t tied to a subject
-Haber (to be)
Hubiera habido / There would have been
The next verb agrees with the subject “Nosotros”
-Comprender (to understand)
Habríamos comprendido / We would have understood
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si hubiera habido traductores, habríamos comprendido la conferencia./ If there had been translators, we would have understood the conference.
4. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that “Esas personas” personal pronoun is ellas ( they), we´re going to conjugate the verbs in agreement with the subject:
-Conocer (to know)
Hubieran conocido / They would have known
-Poder (to be able)
Habrían podido / Would have been able to
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si esas personas hubieran conocido sus derechos, habrían podido defenderse. / If these people had known their rights, they would have been able to defend themselves.
5. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that the implied subject´s personal pronoun is Ellos (they), we are going to conjugate the first verbs in agreement with it:
-Respetar ( to respect)
Hubieran respetado / They had respected
-Arrestar (to arrest)
Habrían arrestado / They would have arrested
Finally, let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si hubieran respetado sus derechos, no los habrían arrestado. / If they had respected their rights, they would not have been arrested
6. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that Alicia´s personal pronoun is ella (she), we´re going to conjugate both verbs in agreement with it:
-Correr ( to run)
Ella + hubiera corrido / She + had run
-Ganar (to win)
Ella + habría ganado / She + would have won
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si hubiera corrido bien, habría ganado el premio. / If she had run well, he would have won the prize.
7. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that the personal pronoun is él (he), we´re going to conjugate the verbs:
ver ( to see)
Él hubiera visto / He had seen
poder (can)
Él habría podido / He could
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si él hubiera visto el accidente, habría podido ser testigo. / If he had seen the accident, he could have been a witness.
8. Because we´ll have to imagine a different outcome for a given situation; we´ll have to use a si clause. Remember, si clauses use the pluperfect subjunctive and the conditional perfect together.
Given that the implied subject´s personal pronoun is ellos (they), we´re going to conjugate the verbs in agreement with it:\
-Manejar (to drive)
Hubiera manejado / They had driven
-Tener (to have)
Habría tenido / They would have had
Let´s take a look at the full answer:
Si hubieran manejado con cuidado, no habrían tenido un accidente. / If they had driven carefully, they would not have had an accident.
Realidades 3 Capitulo 10 Answers Page 146
1. We form the passive voice by using ser + past participle.
E.g: Tú eres admirado. / You are admired.
2. Yes, it does change. It becomes an adjective, so it agrees in gender and number with the subject.
See the explanation
3. We use the present subjunctive after the:
Present Command form Present perfect Future
4. We use the imperfect subjunctive when the verb in the main clause is in the:
Preterite Imperfect Pluperfect Conditional
5. We use either the imperfect subjunctive or the pluperfect subjunctive.
6. We form the conditional perfect with the conditional of haber + the past participle of the verb
E.g: Yo habría comido / I would have eaten
7. We use the past perfect subjunctive in the si clause:
Si hubieras comido / If you had eaten
8. We use the conditional perfect.
E.g: Yo habría ido / I would have gone.
9. Yo habría ido Tú habrías ido Él, ella, Ud. habría ido Nosotros habríamos ido Vosotros habríais ido Ellos, Uds. habrían ido – I would have gone You would have gone He, she, formal you would have gone We would have gone You would have gone They, fomal you would have gone
